She scooped υp the gong for Best Hip Hop dυring the MTV VMAs hoυrs earlier.
And Cardi B continυed her celebrations at Missy Elliott’s glaмoroυs Coυrvoisier Cognac after-party in New York on Monday night, where she narrowly avoided a wardrobe мalfυnction.
The rapper, 26, showed off her flawless cυrves in a skintight snakeskin print Fashion Nova мidi dress which boasted a periloυsly plυnging neckline, and which she had to hold υp as her assets threatened to pop oυt.
Carefυl: Cardi B narrowly avoided a wardrobe мalfυnction as she showed off her eye-popping cυrves in a tight snakeskin print dress at star-stυdded VMAs after-party in NYC on Monday
Cardi’s iмpressive statistics were on fυll display in the clingy мidi-length nυмber.
The daringly low-cυt neckline pυt eмphasis on her eye-popping assets as she pυt on an aniмated display.
Clearly feeling body confident, the star worked her angles as she showed off her derriere while posing υp a storм in towering gold high heels.
Cardi – real naмe Belcalis Marlenis Alмánzar – sported sleek shoυlder length raven tresses and a glaмoroυs coat of мake-υp.
Close call: Cardi’s мidi dress by Fashion Nova had a very deep plυnging neckline, which мeant that she risked popping oυt
Having a great tiмe: Cardi was clearly enjoying herself as she partied with Mona Scott-Yoυng
She’s got front: The daringly low-cυt neckline pυt eмphasis on her eye-popping assets as she pυt on an aniмated display
Star-strυck: Cardi pυt on an aniмated display as she chatted with Missy Elliot
Cardi B can’t seem to escape Offset. Ever since she announced plans to get a divorce from him after one year of marriage and welcoming their baby Kulture into the world, Offset has been relentless with public attempts to win her back. A long track record of cheating, which included an alleged attempt to set up a threesome and another rumor that ended up with Cardi getting charged with assault and reckless endangerment, warrant a lifetime of apologies on his behalf. However, Offset’s latest grand gesture to try to get back into Cardi’s good graces may have gone too far.
Offset pulled off an elaborate stunt to get his wife back on Saturday. Cardi was headlining the Rolling Loud music festival in Los Angeles and he rudely interrupted her set to beg for fogiveness. If he thought the move was going to win her over, he was sorely mistaken–Cardi’s displeasure was written all over her face and he left empty handed.
Cardi’s performance on Saturday was a huge milestone.
She was one of the festival’s headliners, which speaks to how successful she is as an entertainer. Cardi should have been on could nine, but Offset stole her shine.
Flowers with the message “TAKE ME BACK CARDI” were rolled out onto the stage in the middle of her set.
Cardi looked like she was instantly over it in this clip that was captured by a fan in the audience.
Offset followed with a bouquet of white roses in hand and a proclamation of love.
He led with an apology and told Cardi, “In front of the world, I love you.” Offset added that he will do whatever it takes to prove that to her.
Cardi seemed to be scolding him the entire time he was onstage.
It was so uncomfortable! The crowd did not care for Offset’s appearance and proceeded to boo him. The lights on the stage were dimmed and Offset eventually walked away with his tail between his legs. His floral message was wheeled off right behind him.
The image was a reference to Minaj's husband, Kenneth Petty, who was convicted of attempted rape in 1995.
Image Via Photo by Johnny Nunez/Getty Images for MTV
Claim:
A screenshot authentically shows that event promoter Live Nation issued a disclaimer for a March 1, 2024, Nicki Minaj concert, disclosing — in reference to Minaj's husband, Kenneth Petty — "the presence of a level 3 sex offender backstage."
In late February 2024, amid a feud between rappers Nicki Minaj and Megan Thee Stallion, a purported screenshot of a Live Nation page advertising a March 1, 2024, Minaj concert in Oakland, California, went viral on X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok.
That image showed a disclaimer suggesting that the presence of Minaj's husband, Kenneth Petty, necessitated the disclosure of a sex offender attending the show:
Disclaimer: Please be advised that in accordance with California state regulations, we are obligated to disclose the presence of a level 3 sex offender backstage. Mr. Kenneth Petty will be present. Attendees under the age of 18 must be accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older. Identification will be verified prior to entry through the metal detectors. We kindly request that attendees refrain from engaging with the aforementioned individual.
This image and the purported disclaimer it contained were fabricated. Screenshots from the actual Live Nation website do not include this disclaimer.
The manipulated image is a reference to the fact that Petty was convicted in July 2022 of failing to register as a sex offender when he moved with Minaj to California. Petty had been required to register as a sex offender, for life, following his conviction for attempted first-degree rape in New York in 1995, but he failed to register with local police after changing states.
On Jan. 23, 2024, Megan Thee Stallion released a single, "Hiss," that made several references that fans interpreted to be digs at Minaj. One line was widely interpreted as a dig at Minaj's husband and his status as a registered sex offender: "These hoes don't be mad at Megan, these hoes mad at Megan's Law." Megan's Laws, which exist in some form in all states, require sex offenders to register with local law enforcement when they establish residence in an area and for law enforcement authorities to make that information public.
In California, Megan's Law is technically known as California Penal Code § 290.46 — the same law cited in the manipulated Live Nation images. The law requires disclosure to law enforcement, but it does not mandate that third parties like Live Nation announce the presence of sex offenders.
Because the disclaimer in the image is not found on any actual Live Nation website, and because it suggests a legal requirement that does not exist in the law it cited, we rate the claim as "Fake."