Prince Harry and Meghan Markle believe 2024 will be a ‘year of redemption’ for them – and they may even move to LA because Meghan is so ‘popular’ in Hollywood, sources close to the couple claimed today.

Their hope for next year came after they suffered a number of setbacks, including the scrapping of their Spotify contract early and one of the firm’s bosses calling them ‘lazy’ and ‘f**king grifters’.

They were skewered by South Park and Family Guy, named among the ‘biggest losers’ of the year by The Hollywood Reporter and just last week revealed a £8.7million fall in donations to their Archewell Foundation.

PR experts also believe that Omid Scobie’s book Endgame, and the race row it sparked, was also a disaster for the Sussexes, who failed to condemn it.

But sources close to the couple, who are reportedly in Costa Rica, have said in the American media that ‘Harry and Meghan think 2024 will be the year of redemption’ – with Meghan apparently turning down offers of work left, right and centre and Harry also in ‘extremely high demand’.

US Weekly claims that the Duke and Duchess are considering moving with Prince Archie, four, and Princess Lilibet, two, out of their $14.7million (£11.6m) Montecito mansion to Los Angeles so they can be closer to Hollywood.

An insider told US Weekly: ‘They’ve actually been shocked by how popular she [Meghan] is. Her team has never seen anything like it.  There’s this perception that Harry and Meghan have been snubbed in the entertainment industry. But the way they see it, they’re choosing quality over quantity instead of grabbing every opportunity that comes their way.’

Meghan Markle, pictured at Variety's 'Power of Women' gala last month, where she teased 'exciting' new projects

Meghan Markle, pictured at Variety’s ‘Power of Women’ gala last month, where she teased ‘exciting’ new projects

Harry and Meghan were at Invictus in Germany together. The next one is in just over a year in Vancouver-Whistler

Harry and Meghan were at Invictus in Germany together. The next one is in just over a year in Vancouver-Whistler

Meghan, pictured walking this month, has been inundated with offers

Meghan, pictured walking this month, has been inundated with offers

Kerry Washington, Kelly Rowland and Meghan on a night out to watch Beyonce. US Weekly claims Meghan is

Kerry Washington, Kelly Rowland and Meghan on a night out to watch Beyonce. US Weekly claims Meghan is

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry now have just one major media deal left with Netflix (pictured in their mini series) following the cancellation of the Duchess of Sussex's Spotify podcast, Archetypes. Experts say 2024 is a make or break year for the couple

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry now have just one major media deal left with Netflix (pictured in their mini series) following the cancellation of the Duchess of Sussex’s Spotify podcast, Archetypes. Experts say 2024 is a make or break year for the couple

Meghan is ‘laser-focused’ on their foundation and Harry also has a year until the next Invictus Games in Canada.

A second source denied claims recently that her new talent agency WME may be considering dropping her after just six months. The insider said that Meghan is working on a ‘big media deal’.

Meghan walked the red carpet at the ‘Power of Women’ gala in Los Angeles last month, and said they ‘have so many exciting things on the slate’, adding: ‘I can’t wait until we can announce them, but I’m just really proud of what we’re creating. My husband is loving it too, which is really fun’.

US Weekly claims that Harry ‘still has so much more to say’ but it won’t be in another book like Spare.

‘Harry and Meghan want to go in a different direction. They’ve said what they needed to say with regard to the royals. They’re moving on’, a source said.

Meghan is currently ‘laser-focused’ on the Archewell Foundation, the source claims. But there are also TV and film offers on the table, with rumours around Suits lingering.

But she is ‘100 percent more interested in directing and being behind the camera’, one source said.

MailOnline has asked the Sussexes’ spokesman to comment.

But PR experts have taken a more negative view of their prospects recently.

Britain’s leading PR guru Mark Borkowski believes Meghan Markle and Prince Harry‘s Hollywood comeback is already in jeopardy because executives have ‘had enough of them’ and the Royal Family has ‘played a blinder’ by ignoring their ‘negative’ attacks.

The Duchess of Sussex recently signed with William Morris Endeavor (WME) mega-agent Ari Emanuel whose clients include Dwayne ‘The Rock’ JohnsonSerena Williams and other A-Listers – but WME is reportedly having second thoughts.

Meghan also appeared on the red carpet at Variety’s ‘Power of Women’ gala where she teased ‘exciting’ new projects for her and Harry. She also sat with two of LA’s most powerful women, one working for the Oscars and another high up at Universal Studios.

But Mark Borkowski, one of Britain’s most experienced crisis managers, has said he believes that Omid Scobie‘s Endgame – and the royal race row it sparked – has ‘backfired spectacularly’ for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Mr Borkowski has said that Meghan’s Hollywood relaunch is ‘clearly not working’. He claims that her new talent agency WME may be considering dropping her after less than six months amid signs the ‘Hollywood machine’ has ‘probably had enough of them’.

He told MailOnline: ‘Something is beginning to unwind at the heart of Meghan and Harry. I think 2024 is going to be seismic, either because they’re going to do something to recover and find a new positive tactic or it’s going to be the undoing of the brand. It can only go one or two ways. It can’t stay where it is at the moment. Because it’s clearly not working’.

Meghan and Janet Yang, American film producer and the current president of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences at the Variety Power of Women event last month

Meghan and Janet Yang, American film producer and the current president of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences at the Variety Power of Women event last month

Hollywood power broker Pearlena Igbokwe, chairman of the Universal Studio Group sat next to Meghan at the Variety event

Hollywood power broker Pearlena Igbokwe, chairman of the Universal Studio Group sat next to Meghan at the Variety event

He said the couple’s brand could be ‘finished’ in the next year because they are viewed so negatively, in part because of the dignified silence from the Royal Family in the face of ‘constant’ attacks by the Sussexes and their allies.

He said: ‘We’ve see countless appearances of Meghan on red carpets. The story of her being back in play in Hollywood is is all about Meghan trying to return to her own turf and being available for work and getting back to Hollywood.

‘But I would suggest they are getting perhaps conveniently left behind by the Hollywood machine, who have probably had enough of them and enough of the negativity.

‘They’re hinting their big plans ahead, but you know, we’ve heard that all before. So they have to deliver something now’.

On rumours WME might drop Meghan he said: ‘I suspect this is in fact true. It just shows that constant erosion of the institution is not working.’

Brand and culture expert Nick Ede told MailOnline that Endgame could be as dangerous for her career as Spare – her husband’s memoir – was for Prince Harry, claiming her representatives in LA will be worried she has ‘tarnished her reputation and could potentially damage the reputation of her agency’.

Mr Ede believes Meghan could soon become ‘too hot to handle’ after two members of Harry’s family were named as being at the centre of the race row allegations in a Dutch version of the book. He also claimed that the silence from the Sussexes since the book came out makes Meghan look ‘guilty by association’, despite vehement claims by Mr Scobie, who is an ally of the actress, and her friends that she had nothing to do with the book.

Mr Ede said: ‘The book written by Omid Scobie is potentially a career incendiary device for Meghan. Just as Harry’s own goal of a book has proved for him, the new book by Scobie unfortunately has fuelled a fire which many had thought would die down.

‘The issue for a huge Hollywood agent is that they will find it hard to navigate the career of Meghan fearing that more will come out over time and that, with court cases looming from her sister and potentially her father, she has tarnished her reputation and could potentially damage the reputation of her agency’.

Mr Scobie and sources close to Meghan insist that she had nothing to do with the book. But brand and culture expert Nick Ede says Meghan could look 'guilty by association' because the Sussexes have remained silent

Mr Scobie and sources close to Meghan insist that she had nothing to do with the book. But brand and culture expert Nick Ede says Meghan could look 'guilty by association' because the Sussexes have remained silent

Mr Scobie and sources close to Meghan insist that she had nothing to do with the book, pictured right. But brand and culture expert Nick Ede says Meghan could look ‘guilty by association’ because the Sussexes have remained silent

He added: ‘Meghan in the right hands is a superpower – the world’s most famous woman – and on paper she could make millions for herself and for whomever represents her. But she’s proving to be too hot to handle and, even though she hasn’t said anything about the book, she’s guilty by association and this is damaging for her and others as she plots her next career move.’

MailOnline approached WME for comment.

The New York Post has reported claims that WME has been left ‘horrified’ about the potential damage Mr Scobie’s book may have done to the Sussexes’ rebrand.

An insider also told the Daily Mirror that WME are ‘exasperated’ by the ‘never-ending scandal’ around the Sussexes.

Scobie has come under fire after a Dutch translation of the book appeared to accuse King Charles and the Princess of Wales of racism after Meghan Markle claimed that ‘concerns’ had been raised about the skin colour of her son Archie in her bombshell Oprah interview in 2021.

MailOnline revealed how a Dutch translator insisted that she had been sent a manuscript which named the two senior royals. The Times later reported that Scobie’s British publisher had sent a draft copy to the Dutch translator which contained the names.

Scobie swears ‘on family’s life’ naming royals not publicity stunt