Hollywood may look glamorous on the outside, but it’s not without its share of scandals. Many prominent Hollywood figures, including Emma Watson, have had their privacy violated in recent years. The Little Women actress’ images from the clothes fitting session with her stylist were stolen and leaked online in 2017.

Emma Watson’s n*de photos reportedly appeared on an anonymous file-sharing website. However, her representatives denied the reports.

Were Emma Watson’s n*de images leaked?

Emma Watson

According to some publications, Emma Watson’s alleged n*de images were leaked, but her representatives denied the reports and issued a statement. Her publicist issued a statement that said,

“Photos from clothes fitting Emma had with a stylist a couple of years ago have been stolen. They are not n*de photographs. Lawyers have been instructed and we are not commenting further.”
Her legal team didn’t reveal what action they were planning or against whom. In the same year, the British actress caused a stir when she was criticized for partially exposing her b*easts in a photo shoot for Vanity Fair magazine. In one picture, the star was photographed topless while covering her chest with a shawl.

Emma Watson on the Vanity Fair photoshoot controversy

Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint

Watson was accused of compromising her feminist values when she posed for the cover photo of Vanity Fair. She was appointed United Nations Women Goodwill Ambassador in 2014. Therefore, once the pictures from her photo shoot were revealed, netizens and publications accused her of being a hypocrite.

The Beauty and the Beast star commented on the issue in an interview with Reuters and said,
“Feminism is about giving women choice. Feminism is not a stick with which to beat other women with. It’s about freedom, it’s about liberation, it’s about equality. I really don’t know what my t—s have to do with it.”

Meanwhile, Watson once experienced a leak of n*de images threat in 2014 when she gave a speech on gender equality as a UN ambassador for women. In 2015, she addressed the issue and said that she knew the threat was a hoax, as such pictures never existed.

She expressed that she was quite stunned by the allegations.

What is Emma Watson doing now?

Emma Watson

The Harry Potter star has not appeared in any movie since 2019’s Little Women. Talking about her four-year-long absence from acting, Watson explained her decision and said that she was not happy in the film industry and felt caged.

The character of Hermoine Granger is still fresh in people’s minds, and her fans are eagerly waiting for her return. Her fans’ dream might come true as the beloved actress confirmed her return to the industry in early 2024.         

So, what was the actress doing during her 5-year break? Well, the actress was involved in several endeavors. She began ‘impact-investing’ to support female entrepreneurs and sustainable ventures. Watson also worked on an advertising campaign for Prada in 2022. She also spent a lot of time in her family-owned vineyards in Chablis, a small Burgundian town in France, that is well-known for its white wine.

Source: Time

Though it doesn’t directly concern us, the topic of actor salaries has a curious hold on our attention. We’re drawn to the financial figures these stars command for various reasons, with one notably important aspect for this list being the ability to gauge their value in relation to the films they headline. Scarlett Johansson is no stranger to fat paycheques.

Scarlett Johansson
However, envision having to listen to numerous interviews detailing the grueling nature of the shoot, the taxing hours, and the arduous on-location filming, all for the minimum Screen Actors Guild (SAG) rate of $60,000. The outcome, of course, hinges on the final result. DiCaprio’s portrayal was exceptional, and the movie’s box office returns were staggering. In this instance, it worked out favorably. Yet, such favorable outcomes are not always guaranteed.

Scarlett Johansson Got A Huge Payday For This Film

Scarlett Johansson secured a substantial paycheck for her role in Ghost in the Shell. The project carried significant weight – the protagonist was a woman, and Johansson received compensation comparable to her male counterparts. Furthermore, the production faced controversy related to the issue of whitewashing.

Scarlett Johansson
The final factor cast a shadow over the entire situation, notably impacting the disappointing box office figures. With that being acknowledged, it’s essential to note that the film itself was lacking in quality. While the $60 million loss can’t solely be attributed to the issue of whitewashing, it certainly didn’t contribute positively to the situation.

They opted for a bold move by selecting Scarlett Johansson, who is distinctly Caucasian. However, when you consider that Johansson commanded a salary of $17.5 million, the rationale behind this casting risk becomes considerably perplexing.

Scarlett Johansson Sued Disney In 2021

Back in 2021, renowned MCU star Scarlett Johansson initiated a battle against the entertainment behemoth. Johansson alleged that Disney violated their agreement by launching her individual MCU film, Black Widow, concurrently on both their streaming service and in cinemas.

Consequently, on the 29th of July, 2021, Scarlett Johansson lodged a legal complaint against the corporation. The lawsuit contended that “Disney intentionally induced Marvel’s breach of the agreement, without justification, in order to prevent Ms Johansson from realizing the full benefit of her bargain with Marvel.” 

Scarlett Johansson
As a consequence of Disney’s contractual breach, the actress encountered a financial setback, given that her compensation hinged on her film’s box office achievements. Despite Black Widow making a robust debut at $80 million, the movie subsequently underwent a significant downturn of 67% due to the hybrid release, leading to its sharp decline.

Furthermore, Scarlett Johansson emerged victorious in her legal battle against Disney, and the two entities managed to find common ground and reconcile their differences following the resolution of the legal conflict.

Source: The Richest